Globalization is a process fueled by, and resulting in, increasing cross-border flows of goods, services, money, people, information and culture (Held et al. 1999:16 ). Stephen Kobrin (1997:147-148) describes globalization as driven not by foreign trade and investment but by increasing technological scale and information flows. It sometimes appears loosely associated with neoliberalism and technocratic solutions to economic development and reform (Evans 1997). Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay But the term is also linked to advocacy networks and cross-border organizations that defend human rights, the environment, women's rights, and world peace (Sikkink 1998). The environmental movement, in particular, has raised the banner of globalism in its fight for a clean planet, as in its slogan “Think Global, Act Local.” Therefore, globalization is often constructed as an impersonal and inevitable force to justify certain policies or behaviors. One economic orientation of globalization is "the growing economic interdependence of countries around the world through the increasing volume and variety of cross-border transactions of goods and services." and international capital flows, both through the more rapid and widespread diffusion of technology." (World Economic Outlook 1997) Globalization also describes a world environment in which much freer international circulation of goods, capital, people, information and ideas is making global market forces more important in the daily lives of the world's people than the political forces of nation states. But the economic processes of globalization are nothing new goods, capital and people as telegraph and steamship technology made international communications and transportation much faster, easier and cheaper. This extraordinary period of growth in the global economy was interrupted by two World Wars and the Cold War. but with the collapse of the Soviet Union the primary alternative to “market capitalism” also disappeared. Nation states around the world began to open their economies to international goods, services, practices and ideas, to privatize the means of production that had for years been government-owned. Some believe that words are very important when dealing with globalization. The corporate media has used many words such as “democracy,” “freedom,” and even “justice” to define globalization. Another is to start with the word “democracy” and call the movement against globalization the “Movement for Democracy”. For centuries, globalization has increasingly united the world and created unity out of great diversity. Coca-Cola, Disney and McDonald's symbolize the process, along with Sony, Shell Oil and IBM. They are powerful companies pushing globalization forward, creating new laws, new business practices, new ways to eat and drink, new hopes and dreams. Suppose a spokesperson for the Democracy Movement claims that a great deal of information is being revealed. We are not against democracy, in fact we welcome it and see the movement away from globalization as a movement towards democracy. The corporate media, having reclaimed the word, would have difficulty explaining why police were beating protesters who claim to represent a democracy movement. There are some on the left who are disgusted by it, but that's because it has been used to define fascism, i.eright-wing dictators and all sorts of anti-democratic things. Allowing the corporate media to use the negative term “anti-globalization,” and accepting it, will not get us far. They imply that we are only against it and have no alternatives. Calling it “The Movement for Democracy” already implies an alternative: a system that requires the masses to replace a system that provides for the few. Explaining globalization is an inevitable process, but we should make it work for democracy. It could help unify people, and this should be good news for those who believe in the existence of common values ​​for human beings. Globalization is creating rapid and global changes in communication, politics and human migration patterns. Globalization examines both the strength of these pervasive changes and the different interpretations of them in different parts of the world. New links are being created between religion and politics, between mass media and civil society, between free and forced markets. Things have changed over time only because people are introduced more and more to new things that are not part of their normal way of life. . The constant transition from the use of telephone, radio systems and television to computers, the Internet, cable TV and mobile phones has dramatically changed the ways and lifestyles of many countries around the world. The more goods travel to places other than where they were produced, the more ideas travel from one place to another. The more people move from one place to another, the more the various cultures will begin to alter and form new lifestyles. There are examples that show how some countries are becoming Westernized and how the United States has embraced some of their American-oriented trends. businesses. Over 20% of the world's population speaks English. In India, there are some McDonald's restaurants that serve mutton instead of beef to accommodate the meals of more orthodox Hindus. These examples demonstrate that the more a country engages with other countries and shares their different aspects and lifestyles, the more both countries will adapt and adhere to each other's ways of life. In my opinion, he would be more attracted to someone who is a frequent traveler but still lives in the US. It would give them some ideas on what to expect and what not to expect when visiting these countries. It reveals some details about how that particular country's lifestyle is similar and different from that of the United States. If I were traveling to a country I've never been to before, I would want to know as much as possible about that country, paying close attention to how that country is similar to the United States. For colleagues who choose to study abroad, this would be of great use because it gives them some sort of understanding of how other countries are similar and differ from the United States. It would give them some sort of indication of what to expect before actually leaving and give them an idea of ​​the cultural ways of the country. It could be argued that globalization begins with the dawn of history. The literature, however, tends to date the onset of globalization more recently in the experience of the West. On the one hand, historians have noted the importance of the first tour of the Earth in 1519-21 (Mazlish 1993). World-systems theorists argue that the expansion of European capitalism in the 16th century marks the beginning of globalization (Wallerstein 1974). Some economic historians point to the turn of the century as the peak of international trade and investment before the outbreak of World War I. and the Great Depression threw the world into a spiral of protectionism (Williamson 1996). Some argue that globalization "took off" between 1875 and 1925 with the establishment of world time zones and theestablishing the international timeline; the near-global adoption of the Gregorian calendar and the adjustable seven-day week; and the establishment of international telegraph and signaling codes. Scholars of social movements for the abolition of slavery, women's suffrage, or the prohibition of female circumcision argue that the emergence of contemporary transnational advocacy networks can be traced back to the second half of the 19th century (Sikkink 1998:41-72) . We look forward to a global village connected to each other by the Internet and benefiting from ever-increasing material well-being. Pessimists see a horrible corporate tyranny that destroys the environment and wipes out everything that is healthy and meaningful to human existence. Anti-globalization activists understand that supportive and mutually beneficial global ties are good. But we want social and global connections to promote universal equity, solidarity, diversity and self-management, not to subjugate ever-larger populations to an elite minority. We want to globalize equity and not poverty, solidarity and not anti-sociality, diversity and not conformism, democracy and not subordination, and ecological balance and not suicidal rapacity. Globalization promotes the free movement and exchange of ideas and goods over great distances. Computer manufacturers source hard drives from Malaysia, monitors from Taiwan and processor chips from California. But licit drugs, guns and oil overshadow the computer market in terms of volume and value. Money laundering takes advantage of new global opportunities to move money anonymously. Mercenary companies offer their services to weaken nation states. While the environmental crisis and new diseases show further evidence of the problems facing the new “global village”. The communication of resistance between free markets and democracies is not helped by the conception of globalization as a planetary scenario in which countries are markets and the scope of national policies is limited to decisions that do not harm the competitiveness of local producers. On the other hand, it limits itself to extrapolating the market model to the political and social sphere. It is not surprising that reactions against the “free market” can take on totalitarian tendencies and that criticism of globalization borrows nationalistic and protectionist slogans. changes around us. Many other countries have already been influenced by our way of life and follow our way of life. Some countries benefit from adapting their cultural standards to those of the United States. In contrast, other countries believe that changing their unique lifestyle can alter or damage their image and how that country is perceived. In economic terms, these changes should provide large gains that can be divided among all participants in the globalized economy as capital. flows to those investment opportunities with the highest risk-adjusted rates of return, since goods and services are produced by those who have a comparative advantage (Mr. Joe, my economics professor) in them and since maximizing behavior of Profit in Privatized Public Services Increases Efficiency By reinforcing the effects of these “economic efficiency factors,” rapid advances in information technology and computerization are significantly reducing the costs of global communications. Faster, easier, and cheaper communications facilitate the organization of production on a multicontinental scale, and the rapid movement of enormous volumes of capital between countries makes it possible to rapidly build new production facilities in virtually any nation that wants them..