IndexForensic PsychologyHuman Rights: Military and Enemies of the StateEthical ImplicationsForensic PsychologyWith regards to the discipline of forensic psychology, there are just as many, if not more, ethical implications in this specific psychological modality then any other modality within the career field. The main reason for this is due to the variety of "dual relationships, different modalities and conflicting specific policies and procedures which are often not in line with the APA psychological guidelines but are nevertheless still highly sought after environments pursued by professional psychologists, therapists and researchers in the field of “forensic psychology”. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned”? Get an original essay. Specifically, these workplaces include, but are not limited to a, various government agencies, police departments, rehabilitation centers, prisons, law firms, and private practices. Forensic psychology in its entirety is specifically concerned with the study and application of human psychology and law enemies of the State Consequently, the involvement of psychologists in military interrogations as it applies to the topic of human rights is very controversial to say the least, since both courts and the US Congress are often reluctant to constrain the executive branch when limits individual rights in the pursuit of national security” (Shirin, S. (2013, May) despite the APA rules and ethics that govern the psychology profession in general. However, the public and the APA continue to be wary of the military environment and those psychological professionals who conduct research and work in this environment because "commanders and interrogators have often in the past requested consultations on attitudes, personality, and behavior of prisoners and on the methods of producing the desired information (Greene & Banks, 2009). These actions are highly unethical and very dangerous to the safety and general well-being of the subject (and as such violate the psychological standards of the APA). noted that very few psychological professionals have ever “had specialized training to prepare them for this type of mission” (Greene & Banks, 2009). Furthermore, contrary to popular belief, psychological professionals “have begun to assist commanders in preventing abusive situations from developing” rather than initiating them (Greene & Banks, 2009). Accordingly, both Green and Banks argue that the fear of psychological professionals committing harm against subjects and patients dates back largely to the emergence of the psychology profession itself (and their respective disciplines) when virtually no rules, ethics, or codes of conduct existed. . conduct that governs the profession or its practitioners. In a peer-reviewed article titled “Protecting the Law from Within? Inspector General and Homeland Security Oversight written by Shirin and published by The Stanford Law Review The article argues that the US government (including its team of diverse psychological professionals) "is now playing a significant role in monitoring security practices that limit individual rights" (Shirin, S. (2013, May). Practices by which such situations are “neutralized” include but are not limited to increasing transparency within the agency by identifying specific instances of wrongdoing and human rights violations, as well as providing relief to victims who have suffered such ethical violations by holding officials accountable for such events should they occur again infuture and, finally, addressing current policies by reviewing them where necessary to prevent further cases of abuse and human rights violations. As highlighted in the peer-reviewed article entitled “Ethical Guidelines Evolution in Psychological Support to Interrogation Operations,” professional psychologists work to “analyze and predict terrorist behavior, vulnerability, help local populations understand and cooperate, support and effectively repatriate troops" (Greene & Bank, 2009). soldiers showed improvement from psychological consultations and subsequent therapeutic sessions" (Greene & Bank, 2009). Ethical Implications With regards to ethical implications in relation to forensic psychology, it is psychological professionals who fully responsibly comply with the current APA psychological standards, which emphasize benevolence, responsibility, confidentiality, integrity, justice, protection of human rights and dignity of patients and of customers. Furthermore, if the psychological professional learns at any time that his or her work is being misused or misrepresented, he or she must resolve the matter by writing letters and personally speaking with affected parties “requesting retractions of specifically cited misrepresentations, or by discussing with appropriate people and the corrective measures to be taken” (Fisher, CB 2009). Furthermore, the psychological professional is expected to act ethically, verifying that requests are followed up and that misrepresentations have been permanently and accurately corrected. Specifically. , while working with military and government projects, assignments, or facilities (as a team member), a psychological professional is expected to “clarify the nature of any “current” and “emerging” conflicts, making known his or her commitment to the APA Code of Ethics by taking “reasonable steps” to resolve conflicts consistent with the General Principles and Ethical Standards of the Code of Ethics” (Fisher, C.B. (2009). Recently, in 2010, the APA association officially amended its section 1.02, Conflicts between ethics and Laws, regulations or other governmental legal authorities following reports of psychologists involved in highly humane military interrogations involving torture and unethical treatment of prisoners in centers such as Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib. At present, the guideline (Standard 1.02) now requires all psychological professionals to take professional action on (and take a stand against) the unfair, harsh and inhumane treatment of prisoners/patients, essentially “prohibiting psychological professionals from engaging in acts that they do not encourage or encourage.” justify a violation of human rights” (Fisher, CB, Ph.D., Brodsky, SL, Ph.D., . Neal, TM, Ph.D., Michelle A. Jones, MM, Ph.D., Lichtenstein, B., Ph.D., Kinscherff, R.T., Ph.D., & Grisso, T.J., Ph.D. (2013). Protecting the rights of military service members is also addressed through the “DoD Directive” and the “DoD Directive.” Instruction that prevents commander-directed mental health evaluations, informs military service personnel about which psychological professional will conduct their evaluation, gives soldiers the right to obtain a copy of the mental health report, the right to a second opinion, and the right to seek and speak with legal counsel, a chaplain, and members of congress or senate" (Fisher, C.B. (2009). Please note: This is just an example. Get a personalized document from our team today expert writers. Get a custom essay Additionally, psychological professionals along with the APA psychology codes of ethics, work to protect their patients and clients from the legal system by informing the relevant authorities about the standards incorporated into the APA code of ethics. That is.