IndexIntroductionDiscussionConclusionReferencesIntroductionThe Wingate test is a thirty-second anaerobic cycle ergometric test measured in watts. It is commonly used to evaluate lower and upper body performance. In essence, it can serve as a performance indicator for power, which can play an important role in specific sports and physically active individuals. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Considerations taken into account when measuring power during the Wingate test include weight (kg), number of laps/second, distance per lap, and time (sec). Although the Wingate test is one of the most common tests to evaluate power performance and anaerobic capacity in athletes, other tests such as treadmill running, treadmill skiing, arm ergometers, rowing and wave pool swimming tests, depending on the specific area of ​​the individual. of training. Previous research has compared upper and lower body ergometry in elite athletes, showing that peak power outputs for arm ergometry are 55-77% lower than for bicycle ergometry. In general, VO2max and cardiac output tend to be 30-90% slower in the upper body than in the lower body during the transition from rest to higher exercise intensities (Koppo, 2002). Other studies have also examined the contribution of various energy systems for the Wingate test, with aerobic contributions ranging from 16 to 29%, while the remainder of the ATP comes primarily from ATP-PCr and glycolytic energy systems to achieve peak power. . However, these studies primarily looked at athletes. Most studies that have examined the Wingate test and its effect on peak power have been conducted predominantly, as already mentioned, on elite athletes or highly trained individuals, taking into account factors such as VO2max, cardiac output and heart rate threshold. lactate (all common factors in the increase in intensity exercise test power). The purpose of this study was to examine peak power (PPO) in association with test time intervals and energy systems used in a college-aged population. The subjects showed a range of activity levels, heights and weights. Methods Five exercise science majors from Florida Southern College volunteered to be subjects in this study. The height (cm), weight (kg) and resistance (kg: 7.5% of body weight) of the subjects were all measured and taken into account. All individuals were physically active, 3 to 17 hours/week. However, all subjects were trained in both aerobic and anaerobic modes, with the exception of one participant who trained only in anaerobic mode. The test involved the participant himself, a tachometer, a timer and a scribe. The test began with a five-minute warm-up and two-minute recovery. Peak power scores (PPO, relative peak power, low peak power) and fatigue index were measured during a 30-second cycle ergometer test (Wingate), followed by a 2-5 minute cool-down. Revolutions per second were called at each 5-second interval within the 30-second test duration, with the first recording at the end of the 5 seconds. Each participant was advised to wear sports clothing in order to carry out this test before the meeting. This test and its results were performed in an exercise science laboratory located on the Florida campusSouthern College. Discussion The primary finding of this study was that as time increased, mean revolutions decreased in these college students. Initially, on average, participants showed 12.6 rpm at the 5-second mark, with a fairly steady decrease in rpm until the 30-second mark of the test. This suggests that a high-intensity, short-duration activity, such as the Wingate cycle sprint, will likely cause the body to use the ATP-PCr system as its dominant energy system to quickly require a lot of energy. However, compared to the oxidative system, the ATP-PCr system will be able to recruit ATP more quickly, but will produce less of it. Therefore, it is difficult to maintain that level of energy and power as the test goes on, especially when cycling against BW (causing other factors such as lactic threshold, O2 deficiency, etc. to occur). A higher peak power output, as well as a lower fatigue index, would suggest that the individual is trained anaerobically. They have more efficient oxygen uptake and utilization, so they will fatigue at a slower rate and be able to exert more power. Those who are highly trained and fit individuals can develop a stronger and larger left ventricle over time, resulting in more efficient pumping of blood to the body's skeletal muscles. So, over time, they may become more economically efficient with their energy/oxygen, making it easier to work less at the same workload/pace than someone who is less economically efficient. Genetically, they may also have more type IIx/IIa muscle fibers. It was also shown in Graph 3, although not consistent, that there is some indication of an association between increased body weight and increased PPO. This may suggest that a higher BW means a greater amount of muscle mass, predominantly in the lower body/legs compared to the upper body, meaning that subjects who had a higher BW were able to exercise a greater overall power. Further research is needed to evaluate body fat percentages in relation to BW and PPO. The limitations of this study include potential errors made by timers, scribes, and counters in the study, considering that the people who conducted this study were primarily students in the learning environment and not licensed professionals. The data could also be biased and slightly distorted due to participant errors, such as not remaining seated during the test or making only a sub-maximal effort. Factors such as what participants ate before the test, hydration levels, self-efficacy in relation to the test, body fat, the type of anaerobic/aerobic activity they regularly participate in (recreational swimming vs. weight lifting vs. jogging, etc. .), and they did not even take into account how long they have been a physically active individual; and this could, therefore, influence the data. Alternative measurements to this test are also relevant. For example, to evaluate the anaerobic power of a group of 100 lacrosse players, a vertical jump test is feasible. In the vertical jump test, the power output to achieve the maximum jump height is performed within 1-2 seconds, which suggests that the ATP-PCr system is used with such a short time interval. Both feet remain on the ground with one arm raised vertically and the body remains in a static position. From there, the athlete will be asked to jump as high as possible and touch the wall at the highest point with the fingertips on the vertically raised arm. This height will come, 12, 1345–1351.