When talking about the curious incident of the dog in the night, Haddon made it clear that he sees it as a piece of realistic fiction that is actually realistic: no lucky encounters, no interventions from a deity , just monotonous life. However, some have criticized that The Curious Incident falls short of these ideals because it uses strange events such as a dead dog and an impromptu sprint in London to advance the plot. Parallels can be drawn between this and Occam's razor. Occam's Razor essentially states that in most cases the simplest solution should be considered first. In other words: extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Realistic fiction books rarely meet this standard. For example, The Great Gatsby is based on a lonely millionaire so in love with a woman that he sets up his house. Technically this could happen but, in reality, it would almost never happen. And, in any case, The Great Gatsby never covers the day-to-day events of Nick's life. Despite what critics say, Christopher's reaction to the pivotal events of The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time is not escapism and aligns with Haddon's philosophy because his reaction is proportional to the events and realistic. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The entire book passed in Christopher's mind. This is, for the most part, a delightful experience. He has a unique way of thinking and we are privy to his every thought. Haddon uses this omniscient perspective in his mind to follow Haddon's philosophy of "use your imagination and you will see that even the narrowest and most mundane lives have infinite scope if you examine them carefully enough." Christopher certainly proves this to be true by discussing mathematical concepts such as the Sieve of Eratosthenes and its arbitrary limits such as "I think I would like the pink squares but not the yellow ones because I don't like yellow." At first glance, this is an extraordinarily boring paragraph due to its trivial topic. However, Haddon has Christopher tell it in such a fascinating way that it engages the reader and teaches us a lot about them. Haddon clearly puts a lot of effort into developing Christopher's daily life. Haddon manages to grab the reader's attention with the most mundane events. Haddon's presentation is enhanced by the fact that Christopher suffers from Asperger's syndrome. It's safe to say that the vast majority of the book's audience would never have spent much time thinking about the mind of someone with Asperger's syndrome. However, from the meticulous description of the dead dog in the first paragraph, we can tell that there is something different, even if he is talking about mundane events. This allows Haddon to describe mundane events and be truly realistic fiction while actually having fun with the reader. For example, when the policeman questions him about his potential involvement in Wellington's death, Christopher thinks that "he was asking too many questions...They were piling up in my head like loaves of bread in the factory where Uncle Terry works." This clever way of thinking holds the reader's attention while staying true to the philosophy of being as normal as possible and using imagination as a “hook” for readers to stay invested in the story (as opposed to unrealistic plot jumps like most of realistic films). fiction). This gives Haddon more freedom to talk about mundane events because he can rely on Asperger's syndrome to engage the reader. Critics argue that while Haddon executed the early parts of the story well, this one falls apart in the.