According to Carl Von Clausewitz, war is therefore an act of force to force our enemy to do our will. It is used to counter the enemy with the use of modern types of equipment or armaments. It is a physical force in which two opposing forces try to overcome each other for the sake of victory. Furthermore, some limitations such as international law and custom are attached to this strength. So the purpose of war is to impose our will on the enemy. To win you have to make the other person helpless because this is the true purpose of war. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay What is war? War has various types of elements in its parts and sections and then war has various types of elements in its parts and sections and finally its internal structure as a whole. From the simple to the complex, war must be understood in its nature as a whole because war does not function separately but as one. To begin with, the elements, let's start with maximum use of force. Kind-hearted people would always think of an alternative way to fight without too much bloodshed, and that is what they believe to be the true purpose of war. It may seem real, but war is dangerous and kindness produces the worst outcome of war. Because in reality, even if one uses maximum force and the other does not, the one who applied it will always win. Furthermore, the aim is to disarm the enemy, as already mentioned the aim of war is to deprive or reduce the capabilities of the enemy's use of armaments. Third, Maximum effort of strength, if one wants to overcome the other then he must exert his full potential to destroy the other's resistance. The author made a good idea and a very interesting discussion regarding the war. He used the words nature and purpose to emphasize his concept of war based on his experience with the Napoleonic Wars. For me, the strong point of the article is the whole idea of ​​war as it is understood that its true nature or purpose is to outwit the opponent with brute force to achieve victory in every battle. Even with great strength, it still comes with weakness and that is being inaccurate or incomplete. Not all of Clausewitz's ideas or concepts are applicable in today's future warfare as there are many factors that influence battles. One of the reasons I consider the article weak is that it is mainly based on the Napoleonic wars, so every little detail that can be considered in waging a war was not included. For example, the effective use of modern technology which can be an important factor in battle. For me, reading chapter 1 of the book was a good choice as it introduces us to the main or true nature of war. And not only that, but it is also easily understandable because it uses words that are not too complicated. From the introduction to the end of the chapter we can clearly interpret the meaning of each idea presented. I don't really like the concepts presented by the author, because I'm more of a fan of Sun Tzu than him. Because for me going to war doesn't have to be a bloodbath but just using the minimum effort to achieve the goal. And that's what I believe and that's why I'm against Clausewitz in some of his ideas. In conclusion, war with or without the use of full force is still war. And considering some other factors that influence war, things don't go as we would like because it's a battle of the minds. Even if we follow these principles of warfare, we can never say whether we will win or not because that is where each side's strategies will be used to determine the winner. Here.