The doctrine, originally coined by Samuel T. Coleridge in his 1817 publication of Biographia listeria, "suspension of disbelief" is based, primarily, on the idea that, to fully immerse oneself in the imaginary world, it is essential to force oneself to believe in premises not normally accepted in the "real world". By engaging, transiently, in the semi-conscious decision to suspend disbelief in favor of an appreciation of the arts, viewers use their imagination to underestimate realism. The prescribed title > urges, and in fact obliges, the understanding of the language used, in particular with reference to the decoding of the phrase 'essential characteristic'. This essay will explore the clever suggestion that "essential feature" means "necessary part or attribute", then focus on the claim that suspension of disbelief is not a preface limited exclusively to theater, rather presents its necessity in both cases. areas of knowledge, natural sciences and religious knowledge systems. The core of scientific progress relies deeply on the prospect of theorized ideas, both untested and unproven. This presents the appearance that suspension of disbelief is required to advance. Predominantly in its embryonic stages, but still today, with the ever-developing nature of science, scientists must believe in its plausibility, without any certainty in its truth. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Briefly discussed in our IB physics lesson when we learned about electromagnetic fields, we started a discussion about how, where, unlike the known electromagnetic field, in the standard model of particle physics, the elementary particle, known as the particle of the Higgs boson, has a constant non-zero value in vacuum. The recently released Higgs boson particle was discovered purely on the basis of imagination. What now serves as an explanation for all physical forces, this item has been described as "The only particle predicted by the standard model of physics that has not yet been observed" (Hank Green). Even before the particle was discovered, it was called “famous,” suggesting that many people already believed in its existence, without any evidence. Before its discovery, it was “invented” as a way to explain discoveries in the field of particle physics. In an article in the Smithsonian it became prevalent that none of the language used was based on certainty; the fundamental ideas were accompanied by the words 'if I imagined'. The language itself suggests that this discovery was based primarily on a “what if,” thereby constituting the presence of suspension of disbelief; such language is the language used by the people making these discoveries, further supporting the claim that there is some sense of awareness of the paradoxical nature of one's field, which creates some confusion. If they know they are only pursuing things they are imagining, why do they continue to pursue them? This question allows the entire claim of prescribed title to be turned on its head, offering an explanation of a case in which the presence of a suspension of disbelief would effectively halt the process of advancement. This concept of an alternative picture of reality, as explored in the example above, can be disproven in an alternative area of ​​natural science. Indoctrinated into two types, discovery and experimental science, the system of biology can be praised for explaining living formssimple and complex in the universe, as we know it. Every biology course I have taken began with the reintroduction of cell theory, and year after year, I was given the fundamentals to deepen my understanding as a biologist. Cell theory delineates both discovery and experimental science. Discovered is based on observations whereas experimental is based on the testing of controlled hypotheses. The very origin of cells, as explained in cell theory, was formally articulated in 1839 by Schleiden and Schwann and has remained the foundation of modern biology. The idea predates other major paradigms of biology, including Darwin's theory of evolution (1859), Mendel's laws of inheritance (1865), and the establishment of comparative biochemistry (1940). First discovered by Robert Hooke in 1665, the cell, Hooke observed, looked eerily similar to the cells or small rooms inhabited by monks, hence the name. Thus, since the very essence of biology, the building block, so to speak, is grounded in discovery, it allows for the interpretation that biology is rooted in observable (discoverable) science as opposed to that which requires a suspension of disbelief . Discoveries in the field can be attributed to experimental biology, some of which are revolutionary and still affect millions of people around the world today. To name a few, RNA Interference, which directed research into "silent genes", the cloning of Dolly the sheep and the discovery of stem cells. It is therefore obvious that further advances in biology will rely on this principle, thus making the suspension of disbelief an "essential feature" in the natural sciences. Faith, a way of knowing, almost adapted to the knowledge area of ​​Religious Knowledge Systems, is a belief in that which has no tangible evidence. If faith comes from within religious literature – the Koran, the Bible, the Torah – is there a particular mechanism that can define a document of faith? Great novels and film scripts are similar to great religious documents in their stories and the connections they make to the human condition. If I can believe that Adam and Eve were cast out of the Garden of Eden or visualize the enormity of the Tower of Babel, I can imagine Kafka's insect and Ahab's white whale. Does the concept of “willing suspension of disbelief” play as important a role in faith as it does in reading and analyzing literature and watching fictional films? As writers, we use the concept of willing suspension of disbelief as a working tool. When does a reader turn away from the narrative and realize that the writer is manipulating them? At what point in the novel or story does the writer distract us and distance us from our poetic devotion and faith in the authorial vision? These questions are discussed in workshops in writing programs and English departments globally. This concept is critical for writers because readers who commit to reading a long story are willing to suspend disbelief for a good story, but are only willing to accept it if it is executed correctly and perhaps masterfully. We are willing to follow the allegory of Animal Farm to discover the writer's meaning and intent. We are willing to put our faith and our time in a duffle bag aboard the Pequod and chase a white whale. We also find it easy to follow a windmill-bashing madman with a sarcastic sidekick. Willing suspension of disbelief is important as it is a psychological or mental process that readers and writers use to move between words on the.