The book "Merchants of Doubt" by Naomi Oreskes and Erik Conway proposes the common thread linking lung cancer, nuclear weapons, acid rain, ozone hole , pesticides like DDT and climate change together. They have all been victims of an anti-environmental agenda that for decades has contradicted scientific facts and thus slowed our response to these dangerous environmental situations. And they all revolved around the same group of people like Singer and Seitz. In any case they tried to keep the controversy alive by spreading confusion across the country so that industries would continue to operate the business while any jurisdiction was delayed. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayThe statements of eminent people, if observed, are tainted by faulty reasoning, mainly using Appeal to Ignorance everywhere, and have evoked confusion by claiming that there were doubts within the scientific community. In the context of global warming: Please note: this is just one example. Get a custom article from our expert writers now. Get a custom essay Thomas Schelling, the economist who stated that adaptation or immigration was the solution to environmental change and in the letter to the Academy he also mentioned that scientists were uncertain and therefore politicians should not adopt any regulations yet to save on potential costs. He said they should instead fund more research. [Misdirection] Climate Change: Carbon Dioxide Assessment Committee Report, was a two-sided report consisting of 5 chapters by natural scientists arguing that climate change was serious and 2 chapters by economists emphasizing waiting to see what it could have happened. Implementing the carbon tax has also been difficult. Nierenberg, like Schelling, insisted on the solution of migration to another place and that no political reforms were necessary. The EPA has prepared two reports, both alarming in the severity of the CO2 buildup, which was discounted from the October Keyworth Monthly Report to the NAS report. Evidently people who were not experts (economists) in the field received more attention and set policies. So GMI, founded by Seitz, in its report attributed most of the warming to the Sun, rather than the effects it created. due to the use of fossil fuels and the industrial revolution. They chose the data (Keeling curve from 6 other graphs) from Hansen's team and presented it, showing the linear curve and ignoring the exponential growth of CO2 in the environment. Fred Singer, a physicist, then used the same playbook he had used for the American tobacco industry; they doubted the alarming effect of global warming and the increasing effect of C02 like the cancerous effect of cigarettes. Also acid rain and ozone depletion. Then, in the 1990s, Singer again attempted to recreate Strawman's mistake when he claimed that global warming was the greatest global challenge facing humanity. Seitz blamed Santer and the IPCC's research work for the increased human impact on nature and said it should be abandoned by the government, then rely on GMI for data. [Ad hominem, slippery slope]. Over the decades, Singer and Seitz have repeated the accusations they had already made, but Singer also took the opportunity to overturn the IPCC's caution in this regard. Seitz, had used the strategy to persuade people to believe that smoking tobacco was safe, was one way.