Pablo Escobar was a latter-day Robinhood and a terrorizing criminal rolled into one. By the mid-1990s, Pablo Escobar emerged as the leading emblem of the drug-related violence that inflamed Columbia in the 1980s and early 1990s. Pablo Escobar and other drug lords rose to prominence in Medellin and Cali. With the unstable demand for cocaine from America, their fortune grew at a rate that seemed nothing short of a miracle. And with this request their ambition grew. It ultimately leads to overbearing ideas and their implementation. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Pablo Escobar was such a figure, with power, violence and success, which is a fitting framework in the current times of how ambition can be turned on its head. He ruled the Medellin Cartel with tremendous violence. It has encouraged corruption at all levels of government. He stole, killed, and destroyed the mostly innocent lives of people who became addicted to or died from cocaine addiction, including those who tried to end this business or take over his position. At the same time, Escobar was an extremely generous man for the poor of Colombia. He liked to give to others and hence was seen creating infrastructure like football pitches etc. He was extremely generous to the poor people of Colombia. The portrayal of events in the story was based on the perspectives of a few who gained ground in the vast arena of the world. Power, Money and Violence captures the imagination more quickly than the routine sublimation of art and culture. Technology also unmistakably enters our lives, surpassing previous versions. Media has evolved from scrolls, lithographs, newspapers, state television to privatized colleagues to modern versions of the Netflix story. Overwhelmed with options, the user probably still reigns over me with their choice to pay monthly subscriptions. Network series like Narcos spread across 20-30 episodes over 3 seasons will definitely keep the user's choice in mind. Division may be what is acceptable to the US government, leaving only the treatment left to the producers and directors ringing the cash registers. In short, only narratives accepted by the government, if not tacitly approved, will see the light of day. What can sell is good! Any government will have an important role in approving the context of whatever is depicted. As in the past we had a historical narrative that was more controlled by states, bureaucracy and aristocracy, now it is money and government that definitively influences the century. Pablo Escobar was such a figure, with power, violence and success, which is an appropriate framework for the current times of how ambitions can be overturned and Americans have their own perspective of trying to contain the drugs that ultimately succeeded to make inroads in Miami and other parts of the United States. Mackenzie Dawson (2015) in her New York Post review commented on the reality-based drama: “You can't make it up. People say this all the time, but in this case you simply can't. While some dramatic liberties were taken in this show, particularly with the timeline, all of the major events actually happened and you can Google them after each episode to read about them. " Despite the amount of damage he has caused to the country, Escobar continues to be an object of morbid curiosity for the Colombian public and audiences around the world (Pobutsky, 2013). More often than not, these narconovelas end up skimping on the story Andcelebrate the extravagant lifestyle enabled by drug trafficking (Pobutsky, 2013) Netflix's Narcos seems to fall into this new subgenre, where the lives of famous drug lords like Escobar are depicted under the impression of an accurate historical framework, but in the end they glorify the "results" that the drugs have allowed them. It was also important that the audience satisfied their sense of curiosity; crime dramas highlighted a world they were unfamiliar with and wanted to know more about (Brown et al., 2012). Furthermore, Brown et al. (2012) were able to find that social interaction, having something to talk about with other people, is also a primary motivator for people and pushes them to watch programs that can become topics of conversation. Stevens Aubrey et al. (2012) found that college-aged viewers are attracted to reality programs to satisfy instrumental needs. These needs include the ability to use media as a topic of conversation, allowing them to further engage with viewers their age who are also drawn to reality programming. Previous studies argued that current events and news reports were more likely to satisfy these needs (Rubin, 1983). Narcos as a web show attracts audiences from both countries and can be studied within an audience-centric framework for both audiences. Simon Bolivar is seen as a national icon in much of modern South America. He is considered one of the great heroes of the Hispanic independence movements of the early 19th century. In recent years, “narco novelas” have become a staple of Spanish-language television, and I have avoided them like the plague. (Bernardo Aparicio García) Browsing the critics' comments on the Narcos web series, one might find comparisons between Narcos and Breaking Bad, Goodfellas and other similar series, however the question to be addressed here is whether a Colombian could watch Pablo's story Escobar as entertainment? Pablo Escobar and other drug lords rose to prominence in Medellin and Cali. With the unstable demand for cocaine from America, their fortune grew at a rate that seemed nothing short of a miracle. And with this request their ambition grew. It ultimately leads to overwhelming ideas and their implementation. A formidable combination of intelligence and cunning allowed Pablo Escobar to rise above his contemporaries. “In the late 1970s, cocaine became more fashionable as the disco era came into full swing. It has become a club drug and a powerful booster for Wall Street executives. The demand was enormous and Pablo Escobar wanted to participate in the business as much as possible." “Despite its claims of “historical accuracy.” The creators of Narcos hijacked the story, bombed it with a car bomb, and then mixed and matched together thousands of pieces, events, and characters in the name of artistic license and the search for new markets. More broadly, the Netflix series reflects the deeper problems of relegating Columbia's culture, politics, and history to a site for commercial purposes. (Lina Britto) Keep in mind: this is just one example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a custom essay History has the characteristic of repeating itself without copy in America-safeguarding society India-udta Punjab national interest-territorial distance. Cocaine was extremely profitable in Colombia, and it has been suggested that in 1985 the profits made from the cocaine trade represented 8.7% of Colombia's GDP. An important way in which Colombians remember Pablo Escobar was the strong national desire to separate contemporary Columbia from its past., 60(2), 189-207.