Deliberate online falsehood and fake news can be the claim to be false, can be a lie to make up a story online to create chaos regardless of political issues, economic, social and legal issues and lying about political, economic, social and legal issues can also lead to riots and possibly cause preventable loss of life. It can also be considered the objective of data dissemination by the individual or association; who presents himself on an online stage; which is obviously false; and has a huge effect, for example, influencing national security or racial and religious concordance. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay A new law is not required to deal with online deception, activists said, who rather called on the government to allow the general population more prominent access to data and increase efforts to improve media literacy. Existing laws could already be used and have been used against (considered online deception) in Singapore and abroad. There is a high risk that any authoritarian activity stifles free speech and can be used against the genuine articulation of contradictory views,” he said in his composed accommodation. This demonstrated that pre-Internet era laws can be effectively used against online crime - and even Furthermore, if new laws are passed, the group said, they will need to be amended and not result in the evacuation of real content, including political discussion which will be a key weapon in the battle against fake news, noted, including that basic and media literacy education should start from the beginning, and that there should also be in-depth political training. Additionally, residents should also be able to use the media to become interested in open debate Those who supported or proposed the possibility of another law also said that it should be precisely aligned, so that it can react adequately to a series of thoughtful lies online. There were also other people who warned that the laws could have the opposite effect. While laws are meant to combat deceptions and derogatory articulations, enactment, if used in the wrong conditions, can reverse the flow. What can be counterproductive? Offensive laws that restrict articulations that hurt the feelings of religious or racial groups tend to have a backlash and can be misused by prejudiced groups in the eyes of the public to shut down more outspoken, minority gatherings. Current laws in Singapore, for example, the criticism laws, currently impose an excessive number of confinement points on articulation opportunities and are adequate to handle online deception. Recourse to current laws should also be a last resort. The refinement between mental deceptions and free speech will be critical as it may deceive approach to controlling such misrepresentations fundamentally as a constraint on free speech. Such falsehoods – intended to misdirect individuals, control the outcomes of decisions, and pit groups against each other – undoubtedly harm society, undermine majority rule, and have a place in a discourse that warrants no guarantees. Warning, as the spread of misinformation achieves the opposite effect of free speech and blocks the open discussion that is at the heart of a just society. There are freedoms to.