Critique a research paper Oosterveld-Vlug MG, Pasman HRW, van Gennip IE, Muller MT, Willems DL and Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD (2014) Dignity and the factors that influence it according to nursing home residents: a qualitative interview study. Journal of Advanced Nursing 70(1),97-106. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay This article is a critique of the nursing research paper mentioned above. It was carried out by six authors in the Netherlands with the participation of nursing home residents. The researchers considered the dignity of nursing home residents. The title of this research article consists of sixteen words. The general recommendation is five to ten words for the title (Fischer & Zigmond, 2004). Therefore this title can be defined as a long title. This title contains keywords and can give an idea of ​​the content of the article to enable readers to find this article when searching a relevant database (Bavdekar, 2016; Fischer & Zigmond, 2004). This research document included the professional status of the authors, their educational qualifications and even their addresses (Ryan-Wenger, 1992). Therefore, readers of this article can specify who was responsible for the research and contact the authors (Fischer & Zigmond, 2004). The abstract of this research article consists of 258 words. An abstract commonly contains 150 to 300 words (Fischer & Zigmond, 2004). Therefore this abstract is within the normal word range. These authors wrote their work in the past tense while they wrote the work of other researchers in the abstract present tense (Fischer & Zigmond, 2004). This abstract contains the purpose, context, design, methods, results, conclusions, recommendations and keywords. The abstract contains the method, results, conclusions, and recommendations for practice (Koopman, 1997; Parahoo & Reid, 1988). Therefore this can be called a sufficient abstract. These researchers have reviewed a lot of literature in the introduction and background of this research paper. These parts provide relevant information such as previous research and discussions on the clinical importance of the topic and justify the need for the study (Burns & Grove, 2001; Polit & Hungler, 1997), with appropriate references (Fischer & Zigmond, 2004). Therefore the literature, introduction and background can be defined as relevant to the research paper. These authors presented the research question in the “objective”. The issue is well defined and clear. In reporting qualitative research, the research question should be presented clearly and in detail (Stiles, 1999). Therefore the presentation of the research application can be considered valid. The research design and also the methodology were included in the “design” of this article. These authors have included a reference to justify the selected design. The article explains why the researchers chose this method to collect data (Ingham‑Broomfield, 2008). These researchers selected four nursing homes in the Netherlands for their research. These authors justified their sample selection. This sampling was purposive. The process used to select participants should be clearly described and sampling should be for the purpose of qualitative research (Polkinghorne, 2005). These authors ensured transferability through adequate sample descriptions (Letts et al., 2007). This study presented the characteristics of the interviewees (Low et al., 1998). It seems that the authors have described, 2002).