The broken windows theory is a criminological theory, the essence of which is that explicit disorders such as crime, antisocial attitude and civil disorder positively affect an environment urban environment which induces even more crime and disorder, including serious crime (Wilson & Kellin, 1982). From the moment the theory was announced, it has shown success. Thus, the theory has clear advantages, however, the theory may have been implemented improperly, developing negative effects, and still has undisclosed characteristics. We say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay First, the broken windows theory deals with minor crimes such as vandalism, crosswalking, turnstile jumping, littering, and so on, either through special directions from authorities or community attention. This should undoubtedly be taken into account by the authorities: it is clear that violation of social norms can grow like a snowball, and the fight must be addressed from the first manifestations because antisocial behavior can quickly become a habit for many. By preventing small signs of disorder it is possible to stop a chain reaction and exclude serious crimes. The example of this is the decline in crime in New York City in the 1980s and 1990s, when the city administration adopted some principles of the broken windows theory. Subway quickly changed that when the New York Transit Authority hired George L. Kelling as a consultant (Davies, Fagan 2000). The subway cars were cleaned every time someone entered them, waste was removed, turnstile jumpers were caught by the police and arrested, and thanks to this, the subway service became clean and safe. Therefore, the change in policy in relation to the subway resulted in a drop in crime and required fewer resources than catching criminals one by one. Furthermore, policies based on broken windows theory can make neighborhoods more tourism-friendly; rally community; develop the real estate sector, and therefore cause gentrification, just as premeditated gentrification can cause a drop in crime. By fixing broken windows, regions will become less criminal, more attractive to the rich and more investment-friendly. As a result of this, the city's economy will increase (Harcourt, Ludwig 2006). For example, Ceccato and Wilhemson (2011) suggest in their article that the feeling of safety increases the prices of apartments and houses. Using the example of Stockholm, the study shows that an increase in the total crime rate in a particular area by 1% translates into a fall in apartment prices by 0.04%. Furthermore, the broken windows theory was introduced improperly, because it caused rather negative effects, so the positive effects, which were assumed by the theory, were not achieved and policies should be addressed in other ways. For many years the theory was considered a special tool for crime prevention, giving greater authority to the police. As a result, the police became violent towards minorities, especially blacks, as they were considered criminals and were treated like criminals without distinction. For this reason, persistent stereotypes were formed about blacks, who were discriminated against. The adoption of this specific policy is now considered wrong because it was not effective. Alternatively, another theory policy should be implemented. According to Kleinenberg (2018), the govt, 93(1), 81 - 103