Abstract Ancient Greek philosophers were very crucial in the elucidation of friendship from a philosophical point of view. The article therefore seeks to describe and mitigate the different personal narratives that have inspired philosophers' views on friendship. Philosophers, through their accounts and observations of their current societies, have come to conclusions that have been used to develop the outcomes of friendship. Throughout the article, a detailed approach will provide the main hypotheses and theories formulated by the studied philosophers. The article includes personalized accounts of Aristotle, Augustine, and Socrates. The three philosophers were instrumental in describing how they viewed friendship and the meaning they attached to their associations with their friends. Each of the philosophers is illustrated based on their published works and opinions. The article, therefore, conclusively provides their approaches towards friendship. However, it further determines the factors that led to the allusion by the selected philosophers. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Philosophers Friendship has been a topic for many philosophers throughout history. These philosophers used their position in society to develop theories about the various forms and outcomes of friendship. One of the major contributors to these philosophies is Aristotle. Aristotle, as a philosopher, was very outspoken on questions regarding the structures and consequences of associations. According to Aristotle, friendships that lasted only took him so far. According to him, the friends he had were influenced by the advantages each had for each other. He postulates that most of the time he felt alone, yet he had friends. Aristotle's 2,500-year-old works also continue to shed light on Aristotle's ideologies about friendships. In his works he proposed that associations existed thanks to the “good will” of the people involved (Vernon, 2011). The relationship depended on the need to reciprocate “good will” towards the other individual. Furthermore, he postulated that the desire to form a friendship came “quickly” while friendship did not. Aristotle continued to classify the different forms of intimacy that people formed. One group was friends because each of them was useful to each other, the second because they enjoyed each other's company while the third was based on love and they were each taken by the other's character and innate depth. Socrates, on the other hand, concluded that in the end At the end of his research and work, he did not seem quite capable of discovering the true meaning of friendship. In his way of thinking he was afraid of making commitments to his friends. However, despite his acclaimed attitude of not understanding the values ​​of friendship, he was well aware of the sexual satisfaction that formed an association with people. According to him, there was an indissoluble link between sexuality and friendship. Just like Aristotle, Socrates, through his famous “Socrates speech,” portrayed people into three different categories that imagined the critical perspectives that shaped the outcomes of friendships (Vernon, 2011). According to him, he couldn't understand the values ​​of friendship, but he wanted a “true friend” more than anything. His doubts about finding a friend are due to the fact that he thinks that his life as a philosopher puts him at a disadvantage. Instead, he later concluded that it was not his life as a philosopher that prevented him from absolving friends, but rather his high value for honesty towards whoever was supposed to be his “true friend” (Nichols, 2010). This is just one example. Get a document now.