IndexThe first major view of human nature: Tabula RasaThe second major view of human nature: Innate goodnessThe third major view of human nature: Inclination to evilCompare and contrast the three major viewsConclusionReferencesIn Throughout history, philosophers and scholars have grappled with the concept of human nature. This essay will explore the three main views of human nature: Tabula Rasa, Innate Goodness, and Inclination to Evil. By examining the key proponents, strengths and weaknesses, and supporting evidence of each view, we aim to understand the implications of adopting each perspective. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The First Major Insight into Human Nature: Tabula Rasa The Tabula Rasa theory, championed by philosophers such as John Locke, postulates that human beings are born as blank slates and are shaped by their experiences and their environment. Proponents of this view argue that human behavior and characteristics are a product of their upbringing and cultural influences. Although this perspective emphasizes the importance of nurture over nature, it has been criticized for downplaying the role of genetics and innate traits in shaping human nature. The Second Major View of Human Nature: Innate Goodness The theory of innate goodness, supported by philosophers such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau suggests that human beings are intrinsically good and compassionate. This perspective emphasizes the natural benevolence and altruism of individuals, arguing that selfish and corrupt behavior is the result of social influences. Although the concept of innate goodness takes a positive view of human nature, critics argue that it ignores the capacity for malice and evil in humans. The Third Major View of Human Nature: The Evil Inclination The evil inclination theory, often associated with religious and moral teachings, asserts that human beings possess a natural propensity for wickedness and sin. Proponents of this view argue that individuals are born with inherent defects and sinful tendencies, which must be curbed and disciplined through moral and ethical guidance. While this perspective recognizes the potential for malevolence in human nature, it has been criticized for encouraging pessimism and fatalism regarding the inherent nature of humanity. Comparing and Contrasting the Three Major Views When comparing the three major views of human nature, it becomes apparent that each perspective offers unique insights and implications. While Tabula Rasa theory emphasizes the role of environment and nurture, the Innate Goodness perspective highlights the innate benevolence of individuals. On the other hand, the Evil Inclination theory emphasizes the potential for evil in human nature. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Conclusion In conclusion, the exploration of Tabula Rasa, Theories of Innate Goodness and Evil Inclination provide a comprehensive understanding of different perspectives on human nature. While each view has its strengths and weaknesses, it is essential to consider the implications and consequences of adopting a particular perspective on human nature. Further research and critical analysis is needed to gain deeper insight into the complexities of human nature. References Locke, J. (1689). An essay on the human intellect. Rousseau, J. J. (1762). Emile, or of Education.Aquino, T..