In 1997, a distant cousin of mine gave birth to a beautiful baby girl. She was a very fragile and sickly child. As she grew older, she became increasingly ill. The couple were too busy with their pursuits to take time away from work, and were forced to hire a full-time nanny to look after Deliah during the day once she was released from hospital. Deliah was always in excruciating pain and, as you would expect any child to react, she cried. Constantly. He never seemed to stop screaming and crying. One night the parents came home from work to find no nanny, but the battered, breathless corpse of their daughter Deliah, tucked neatly in her crib. Immediately, as expected, the couple called the police and reported the incident. Evidence showed that the child had been slammed against the wall several times. All signs pointed towards the nanny, who refused to admit she had committed such a heinous crime. As time passed and the drug was tested, the nanny admitted to the crime, with the guidance of her priest, to whom she had confessed the crime many months earlier. The judge recommended capital punishment, but the family rejected the offer. “Killing her won't bring our daughter back,” they said. Was it right for them to refuse the most extreme punishment allowed? Should the nanny have been put on death row for her crime? Capital punishment is a controversial topic that has recently been stirred up in our society. Whether or not this is not only morally, but also politically correct is a major question that has been brought to the attention of many, and opinions never seem to cease or change. Although many think otherwise, I think capital punishment is unconstitutional and should be outlawed in all fifty states. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay “Killing her won't bring our daughter back,” was a brilliant way to state my first position. By giving the nanny a lethal injection, Deliah would not be brought back. Her parents have accepted that she is gone forever. Those who do evil can neither make up for their crimes nor learn from them by losing their lives. So why should you do it? Is it revenge? By taking someone's life, will we repay those who have lost something with their actions? What will someone learn if they are dead? Imagine you are a convicted criminal. You committed a crime like no other. Now, imagine being sentenced to death. There is no doubt that your life will soon end because of this crime. How would you feel? Are you afraid? Are you relieved? I guess I would be comforted by that. The idea of ​​dying, the idea of ​​having a mixture injected into your bloodstream and slowly slipping into a painless, boundless sleep, seems satisfying, compared to the years spent in a penitentiary. What can you learn when you are dead? They say, "An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind." This could be reverted to say “A murder for a murder leaves the entire world unchanged.” The death penalty changes nothing. People know it's happening, they know their actions can have this consequence, but does that change their minds? Do they think twice about what they are doing? Most don't. It is not moral to kill someone who has killed. These people die, yes, some knowing that what they did was wrong, but without having suffered for what they did. What can they learn if they are dead? Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a custom essay The Bible?