Sixty years ago, Bigfoot ventured into the public consciousness. Residents were baffled by the giant human footprints that have continued to trample Americans' imaginations ever since. Bigfoot is a huge and strange humanoid animal that is supposed to inhabit the forested and wild areas of the West Coast and Oregon. The creature is also called Sasquatch, which is the anglicization of the term Sasq'ets, from the language of the First Nations peoples of British Columbia, Halq'emeylem. Believers of the myth claim that they are hairy creatures with ape-like characteristics. They are generally non-aggressive and shy animals with human-like intelligence, which makes them so elusive. Various anthropologists have examined the biological reality of Bigfoot-based footage taken from the Klamath Mountains in Northern California. However, most researchers remain skeptical of the creature's existence and dismiss the phenomenon as the result of misidentification. Over time, narratives about Bigfoot have been incorporated into regional oral tradition and folklore. Historical documentation of the story in the Oregon country dates back to 1904, following sightings of a large wildman in the Sixes River area by settlers. Comparable accounts from hunters and miners followed in the same decade. Today, the incredible beast is by all accounts everywhere, from films to new reports. It is argued that interest in the existence of Bigfoot is so enormous despite the lack of convincing evidence. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The general conclusion of the debate over Bigfoot's existence has been a tempered skepticism that cannot be followed logically by theism, naturalism, or evolution. The right position regarding whether the presence is unguided or misleading remains undetermined. Metaphysical beliefs, for example, can fill knowledge gaps through projection, although this may not satisfy the necessary conditions for knowledge (Wittgenstein p.43). Metaphysical theism and naturalism are perspectives that an individual has adopted as a more coherent explanation than various explanations of intuitions, comments, and reflections on life. Regardless of whether evolution provides evidence against or condones it, the perspectives rely on previously held metaphysical assumptions because they are full of unfounded facts. The underdetermination of the Bigfoot hypothesis takes into account several speculations to cover similar phenomena, all of which will provide an epistemically sufficient explanation. Despite understanding, various refractory peculiarities stand in the way of scientific reduction and justification of the issue at hand. Although theism or naturalism seems objectively correct, it is easy to give reasons to choose one over the other based on general consistency. Bigfoot is just one of many tales of hominids roaming North America. North America. Although mythologies have populated the legends of American Indian tribes, they have recently been transformed into media sensations. In 1967, a clip of a furry creature with hind legs was filmed by Bob Gimlin and Roger Patterson, which remains the most disputed and famous evidence of Bigfoot. However, the authenticity of the video remains in doubt due to the hoax claims. Skeptics say it was staged, while believers argue that the body proportions and movement are evidence of a non-human creature. The debate continues, raising many questions. However, it has been argued that lack of evidence is not evidence of absence of evidence. The animals