The year is 1958 and enormous footprints have trampled the ground near a local construction site without seemingly leaving a trace, but many people believe the footprints mean something more. The legend of Bigfoot originates in Native American oral tradition from a large, hairy creature called a Sasquatch. The legend first stepped onto US soil in 1958, when Ray Wallace found large footprints near a construction site creating a huge commotion. Bigfoot was depicted as eight feet and four hundred pounds (Radford). Over the years, a large following has surrounded Bigfoot with those claiming Bigfoot exists while another group formed, disproving Bigfoot's existence. It can be believed through reason and logical evidence that the latter group is right. Specifically, a mythical legend explains Bigfoot, proven through negative genetic analysis results, lack of physical evidence, falsified prints, and counterfeiting of the famous Patterson-Gimlin tape. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayThe negative results of genetic analysis of the alleged evidence of Bigfoot prove that Bigfoot is a mythical legend. Shortly after the Bigfoot legend arose in the 1950s, the Federal Bureau of Investigation was sent approximately fifteen specimens of Bigfoot hair reported by Peter Byrne with the Bigfoot Information Center and Exhibition. Deputy Director of Scientific and Technical Services Jay Cochran Jr. examined these hairs and the final verdict was that the hairs were part of the deer (Little) family. Prior to this study, people in the community of Bigfoot believers referred to these samples as proof of the existence of Bigfoot, but after Jay Cochran Jr.'s examination which proved these samples to be fake, the idea that the Bigfoot exists has become an unreasonable idea further proving the explanation. Bigfoot is a myth. In line with the Federal Bureau of Investigation's examination, a 2014 study led by Bryan Sykes at the University of Oxford in England, in which thirty alleged Bigfoot hair samples yielded data showing the samples' origin from animals locals such as bears and cows through an analysis of RNA molecules. This further proves that the non-existence of Bigfoot is the only explanation for the legend due to the falsification of highly regarded evidence. Deputy Editor Jay Cochran Jr.'s study of submitted Bigfoot specimens along with the verdict of Bryan Sykes' 2014 study are clear evidence that Bigfoot is a mythical legend due to highly regarded evidence that has been disproven. Along with negative results in genetic testing analyzes showing much appreciated evidence of Bigfoot forgery, the lack of physical evidence of Bigfoot proves that Bigfoot is not real and can only be considered a mythical legend. One of the most widely accepted examples of a lack of physical evidence is the lack of Bigfoot remains such as no fossils or dead remains (Radford). Radford says, “There is no hard evidence in the form of bones.” There are no hair samples, there are no live or dead specimens,” meaning that in the more than fifty years since Bigfoot was popularized in American culture no Bigfoot remains, such as a corpse or a bone, to provide adequate evidence to support the claim that Bigfoot is real. The lack of Bigfoot remains proves that it is unreasonable to agree with the idea of ​​Bigfoot's existence. Other than no physical remains, there is no evidence documented of Bigfoot; in particular, there is no clear picture of Bigfoot (Radford In the year the technology).of cameras has improved so much that nearly every person in America has a high-resolution camera in their pocket. Regardless of innovation in photographic technology, there are still no documented photographs of Bigfoot that provide valid evidence of the existence of Bigfoot.Bigfoot. The lack of clear photographs of Bigfoot along with the lack of Bigfoot remains support the theory that the lack of physical evidence is a key factor in explaining Bigfoot as a mythical legend. Similar to the lack of physical evidence disproving Bigfoot, the falsified prints further prove that Bigfoot cannot exist, meaning Bigfoot is a mythical legend. The ease of faking footprints is easier than ever: "anyone in the world can buy a cast of a supposed Bigfoot on eBay and use it to create tracks that resemble those accepted as authentic by some 'experts'." One of the most used samples of evidence for the existence of Bigfoot are the footprints found. Fingerprints cannot be legitimate evidence since forgery is as easy as ordering something from the Internet. The sheer ease of falsifying prints deemed authentic by experts nullifies the argument that Bigfoot prints are adequate evidence. To illustrate this example, the evidence that popularized the existence of Bigfoot, the discovery of Bigfoot footprints near a construction site in 1958 by Ray Wallace, was proven false in 2002 when the prints' founder's family revealed that he falsified the fingerprints (Urswick). The 1958 prints essentially gave birth to the creature in America, and if the original Bigfoot evidence is fake, what's to say that everything that has spread since that major fake evidence isn't fake? The ease of falsifying footprints and the fact that the original Bigfoot evidence is a fake footprint shows how using the prints as a tenable argument for the existence of Bigfoot is not possible. Along the same lines as print falsification, the Bigfoot evidence that is revered as the most compelling evidence, the Patterson-Gimlin tape, a recording of an alleged Bigfoot walking in front of the camera, looking at the camera and then proceeding to walk into the woods, can be broken down into a hoax through analysis that disproves one of the most scrutinized pieces of evidence of Bigfoot's existence. One of the strongest pieces of evidence against the legitimacy of the video is the fact that the men were scammers (Brinks). Patterson was a known liar, owed people a lot of money and was constantly being sued, and Gimlin was also a shady guy, for example, suing Patterson's widow after Patterson's death to claim more money. The men were known scammers, meaning they were always doing things for attention or an easy way out, and this evidence shows that it is likely that the men pulled this stunt for a quick cash grab by claiming to have found and Bigfoot movie. Along several lines of the men's moral character, nearly thirty years after the event, a friend of the men, Bob Hermious, claimed to have been the man in the suit. He even passed a lie detector with these claims, and many of the people around him agreed that Bob showed them the suit. A friend of Patterson and Gimlin came out to say that he was the man in the suit and passed the lie detector test, thus nullifying the most prized evidence that Bigfoot believers live by. Bob Hermious's undoing of the Patterson-Gimlin tape and the story of the men who lied and looked for an easy way out shows how the most famous evidence of Bigfoot cannot be legitimate, thus proving that Bigfoot is a legend mythical.Continue:.