IndexPurposeMethodsResultsConclusionPurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine whether or not ice hockey players were at risk of injury Non-contact hip injuries compared to other sports. The researchers decided to investigate and examine the differences in range of motion and strength patterns primarily in the hip complex between hockey players and soccer players. The authors and orchestrators intended to observe these differences by comparing hockey and soccer players and their dominant and non-dominant legs through a series of exercises to determine if a significant correlation existed. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Methods This study had a test group of 24 male subjects, all aged 21 years or older. Of the 24 subjects, 16 were hockey players and 8 were soccer players, all subjects were approximately 183.3 cm tall plus or minus 7.3 cm, the weight of the subjects ranged from 74.9 to 84.9 kg. Subjects had to have played at least one season of the designated sports, i.e. ice hockey or soccer, and had not suffered any injuries in the last three months before testing. Other requirements for participation included abstention from alcohol in the 24 hours before the test as well as other substances. Before starting the experiment “height and mass were taken as part of the screening process, accompanied by total limb length measured from the anterosuperior iliac spine to 2.54 cm above the lateral malleolus. Lower limb length was also measured by measuring from the head of the fibula to 1 inch above the lateral malleolus and the anterosuperior iliac spine to 1 inch above the knee joint,” this was done to convert the muscle tests manuals in Nm/kg. Finally, participants performed a 5-minute standardized submaximal ergometer warm-up at 50 rpm before the start of the study was a case-control design: all subjects completed at least an experimental test. The project consisted of range of motion assessment, strength assessment and a leg dominance test. The range of motion assessment consisted of 1 assigned familiarization movement and 3 experimental movements, which meaning that participants were allowed a motion test before the data was actually recorded. The range of motion consisted of “hip adduction, abduction, sitting and lying flexion, extension, and internal and external rotation.” The strength assessment was similar in that it allowed one familiarization movement and then recorded 5 experimental movements. As for the test to determine leg dominance, participants were asked to kick a ball and whichever foot they kicked the ball with was the dominant leg. Range of motion was measured using a standard Gollehon extendable goniometer, strength was tested “using the breaking force method using a portable dynamometer” which allowed the force to be measured in Newtons and then converted to Nm/kg. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 19, a software package used for statistical analysis and then a mixed model ANOVA was used to inspect the interaction between hockey and soccer and dominant and non-dominant legs among athletes, as well as differences between legs and sports in range of motion and strength. No training program was used in this study. Results For how long.