Gender justice and equality for women over the years has been devalued and neglected by society, especially male ones. These points in Roald Dahl's Lamb to Slaughter stories are evidently made by the characters, who focus on the intelligence of a woman, Mary Maloney, to get away with murder after being portrayed as a simple and naive housewife, and A Jury of her Peers by Susan Glaspell which focuses on the understanding and knowledge of two women, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters, regarding the meaning of the evidence found as to why Minnie Wright killed her husband, which the men were blind to . Although the stories are based on different motivations for why the two women killed their husbands, they both convey the fact that women are more intelligent and perceptive than what society has devalued and overlooked about them. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayBoth Mrs. Maloney and the two women in A Jury of her Peers were devalued in their knowledge of each situation due to the fact that they were women and were surrounded by men. Mary Maloney was never accused or thought to be her husband's killer, and the two women were able to find the killer's motives to which the man was blind. Mary Maloney fills the roles of caregiver and homemaker. She was portrayed as a faithful and naive woman who loved her husband unconditionally. “He knew he didn't want to talk much until he finished his first drink. She loved basking in this man's presence.” One night her husband wanted to separate, which upset her a lot and she ended up killing him. Mary Maloney managed to manipulate the situation, the detectives and the policeman for the investigation which led to no trace of her husband's murder. The men underestimated her and the gender stereotype by assuming the murdered was a man. “Take the weapon, you got the man.” Once again, this demonstrates the underestimation that men had of Mary Maloney as her husband's murderer and the devaluation of her knowledge by men that she led to deal with the situation intelligently without leaving any trace behind. Similarly, the two women in A Jury of her Peers are underestimated by men of their intelligence in finding significant reasons as to why Minnie Wright killed her husband. “The sheriff also looked around: 'Nothing here but kitchen things,' he said, with a chuckle at the insignificance of kitchen things.” This shows how the men thought the kitchen was insignificant as a place for "women", when in reality the two women managed to find all the significant evidence of why the crime occurred that the men did not find. It is evident that both Mrs. Maloney and the women in A Jury of her Peers were undervalued in their knowledge and not treated equally by men. Although both Mary Maloney and the two women were devalued by men, they were able to convey the fact that women are more intelligent and perceptive than men overlook them. For example, Mary Maloney, after being portrayed as a naive and loving wife, was able to manipulate the situation and acted as if she had done nothing suspicious with the men she was surrounded by. “Among the sobs he heard some of the whispered phrases: “she behaved normally, very cheerful, she wanted to offer him a good dinner, peas, cheesecake, it's impossible that she did that”. Plus, she was smart enough to give the weapon she killed (a. 2013.