Rhetorical Analysis of Women's Right to Vote Throughout history, there have been numerous speeches that have had numerous and enormous effects on society, however one that will never be overlooked is Susan B. Anthony's speech, “On Women's Right to Vote.” This speech is one of the greatest in history because of the message it sent to the citizens and residents of the United States and the way it was said. The speech had feelings and also logic and for the most part its validity. The way he changed America and the way numerous people thought is the reason I have come to believe that Anthony's speech is an amazing method for breaking down a motivational speech using ethos, pathos, and logos. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The way Anthony has built these things into her speech by providing documentation to explain her facts and also the way she speaks from her point of view as a woman is captivating. From the beginning of his speech, Anthony demonstrates his facts and his credibility, or ethics. After being fined $100 for having to vote in her day without the right to women to vote and for appearing before the government explaining why such actions on her part were acceptable and why she refused to pay. In his speech, Anthony states: "Not only did I commit no crime, but, instead, I simply exercised my rights as a citizen, guaranteed to me and all citizens of the United States by the nation's Constitution, beyond the power of any state of denying them." (On women's right to vote) By providing such evidence, she is fabricating a strong auxiliary basis on her claim to be a citizen of the United States, so no one can deny her the privilege of voting. This offers something to support his speech on an issue that no one can say he wasn't right or deny since it is a record that has based privileges in an astonishing way and made America different from other countries. Anthony also explains how “It was us, the people; not us, the white male citizens; nor us, male citizens; but we, all the people, who formed the Union”. (On women's right to vote). What he was trying to convey was that with the Declaration saying "We" the people means all those who created America, not simply men but rather women of the United States. This makes people rethink and move towards the way that yes, without a doubt women should have similar privileges, all in all, we are all equal and equal and have been granted similar rights, regardless of gender, but the place you are born and created. With such excess being stated, Anthony got to the point using logos, or logic. The logic behind his speech is as simple as saying that the Declaration of Independence expresses that “We” the people of the United States, not just “not we, the white male citizens; nor us, male citizens; but we, all the people, who have formed the Union,” as indicated by Anthony. Besides the fact that she is giving the audience something to consider, she stands out enough to be noticed by acknowledging her and her facts. She uses the statement and so does Webster expressing "Webster, Worcester, and Bouvier all define a citizen as a person in the United States, entitled to vote, and to hold office" (On Women's Right to Vote). With this he is not exclusively using a document and some, giving listeners an approach to realize that he is not just influencing things and demonstrating his knowledge as another individual, not simply as, 2016. 375-6.