Charles Manson and the “family” killed several innocent people in the late 1960s to attempt counterrevolution in the United States. The lead prosecutors in the trial were Vincient Bugliosi and Curt Gentry. They captured the worldwide attention of the public and educated society about the brutal murders. The violent period soon began at 10050 Cielo Drive. Cielo Drive was an isolated house, which made it very vulnerable. The previous owners of the house are Candice Bergen and Terry Melcher. Now the owners of the house are Sharon Tate and Polanski LaBianca. According to Bugliosi and Gentry the distance from the front of the house to the front gate was nearly 100 feet and the closest neighbor at 10050 Cielo Drive was 10070 Cielo Drive, which was nearly 100 feet away. The owners of 10070 Cielo Drive, Mr. and Mrs. Seymour Katt, were already asleep. Ms. Katt said she heard "...in close succession three or four shots...between 12:30 a.m. and 1:00 a.m." According to Bugliosi, Robert Bullington was on patrol in his vehicle that night and called the police station. The venue recorded the call at 4:11 a.m. Winford Chapman, the housekeeper at the Tate - LaBianca, arrived at the residence around 8:00 a.m. Chapman noticed "...a white tramp parked at an odd angle" and that someone had left the external light on all night. Bugliosi and Gentry say Chapman found several blood splatters on the walls and pools of blood where the flag pond was located. He discovered a body on the lawn and one in the vehicle parked in the driveway. The first body found was a white male, Polanski LaBianca. LaBiance had multiple puncture wounds to his extremities and torso while his head was struck. Bugliosi says, “it is so inconceivable that anyone could inflict such ferocity on a human being.” The second body found was that of a white woman, Sharon Tate. Sharon Tate had been stabbed to death. Tate was eight and a half months pregnant and the Manson family had carved an "x" into the baby. That's a total of three murders, including the unborn child. Atchison and Heide state that “…the Manson murders brought about the end of an era of free love, peace and happiness.” Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayCharles Manson spent much of his childhood neglected and abused. Charles Manson's mother's name was Kathleen Maddox. Kathleen Maddox was 16 when she gave birth to Charles. Manson's father, who he never met, was never in the photo (Britannica). His mother, Kathleen, never gave him a name at first. It was called "No Name Maddox". It wasn't until Kathleen married a gentleman named William Manson that "No Name Maddox" took on his full name, Charles Manson. Kathleen was sentenced to prison on theft charges for robbing a boy who "seemed rich." He remained in prison for several years until Manson turned eight. Kathleen was released in 1942. When she was released, critics say Charles and Kathleen spent many nights with "unreliable men in steamy premises." His mother was then arrested for the second time for theft. Manson began stealing from local stores and ended up in a state ward and sent to the “Gibault School for boys.” Manson was not happy in reform school and went looking for his mother. His mother welcomed him back. O'Neill wrote that during an interview Manson said he had a special hatred for women as mothers. Manson ran away from school and began robbing stores for money. This led to his arrest and he was sent to a correctional center. It wasn't long beforeManson escaped from the center and continued his string of robberies. He was eventually captured for the third time and sent to the Indiana Boys' School at the age of thirteen. Manson claimed the school sexually assaulted, raped and beat him throughout the 3 years he spent there. At age sixteen, Manson broke into school with two other boys, stole a vehicle, and traveled across state lines. Manson was caught and sent to another "Training School for Boys" and then to the "National Bridge Honor Camp" where he was caught raping a boy at knifepoint. After leaving there, Manson was sent to several other reformatories and was caught up in similar crimes. In 1954, Manson was declared someone who had experienced "psychic trauma" and deemed "antisocial". It is clear to readers that Manson did not have an ideal childhood. Research studies show that childhood trauma and childhood neglect can lead to deviant behavior in adults. This “idea” manifests itself through Charles Manson's life decisions in adulthood. According to Cudra, Jaffe, Thomas and Dillo in the article “Child maltreatment and adult criminal behavior”, although there is no inevitable outcome of child maltreatment, in a recent review of child maltreatment and delinquency a social learning perspective is highlighted for explain the phenomenon frequency of criminal outcomes in adult victims of child abuse. The article explains the two different thinking styles that contribute to criminal behavior. The first style mentioned in proactive thinking. A proactive criminal uses “mollification”, this simply means that the human being will use a pattern of justifying and rationalizing criminal behavior by blaming society or others, denying or minimizing the seriousness of the act. Those engaged in proactive thinking styles will also have a feeling of entitlement or see themselves as special or privileged. Charles Manson was praised, specific followers were named: he believed he was God, and Manson played into the belief that he believed he was above everyone else. This shows that Manson displayed the traits of a criminal who thought he was entitled. The second dimension of criminal behavior thinking styles is a reactive aggression pattern. This style was very distinct in the sense that a criminal who exhibited reactive thinking was someone who engaged in antisocial behavior, eliminated himself or isolated himself due to fear and anxiety that deterred him from criminal behavior. Said above by Tom O'Neill Manson was deemed “antisocial” by a psychologist. This shows that Manson also follows the reactive thinking styles of a criminal. According to Atchison and Heide's article, a sociological perspective that is highlighted in Manson's case is known as: The General Strain Theory. The general theory of tension is based on the work completed by Emilie Durkheim in her book known as The Rules of Sociological Method. He developed a theory with evidence in a study known as the Durkheim project. According to Durkheim, the aim of the project was to create an elliptical formula according to which "social facts" should be considered by the sociologist as reality, that is, as having characteristics independent of his conceptual apparatus, which can only be ascertained through empirical investigation and in particular through external observations via indicators. In Atchison and Heide's research they link General Strain to Durkheim's theory of anomie, meaning there is little guidance for individuals. General tension is a theory that describes that failure to achieve positively valued goals is relevant to the disjunction between desire and outcomes. “Tension” can be the result of the removal of positive or negative stimuli from thetheir life. Examples of positive value stimuli that are taken are: loss of a loved one, friend, parent or relative while negative stimuli are abuse, criminal victimization, physical punishment, negative relationships with friends or partners, verbal threats, noxious odors , negative school experiences or parental neglect. According to Atchison and Heide, these negative stimuli can lead to delinquent behavior. When this happens, the offender may attempt to escape the negative factors, take revenge on the people responsible for the negative stimuli, or end the relationship.stimuli all together (Atchison and Heide 12). During childhood, Charles Manson is crossed by a multitude of negative tensions throughout his life. As stated above by Atchison and Heide, the delinquent can escape from negative factors. This shows when Charles Manson was sent to different orphanages or reform schools. Tom O'Neill explained that Charles Manson ran away from home more than once to escape "negative tension" such as assault, rape and battery. Atchison and Heide also mentioned that the delinquent would take revenge on those who harmed him. Tom O'Neill said that Charles Manson especially hated women as mothers. This could potentially be a reason why he wanted to kill Sharon Tate. As previously stated, Sharon Tate was pregnant at the time of the murders with an “X” carved into her stomach. Stephan Baron and David Forde in their article, “Childhood Trauma, Criminogenic Social Schemas, and Violent Crime,” state that those who experience various forms of childhood trauma are at greater risk of engaging in criminal behavior in general. This, so far, was the third article that supported the idea between trauma and behavior. Baron and Forde propose different criminological perspectives to better understand the link between abuse and crime. The following approaches have been used to identify important mediating factors that could potentially explain the association between trauma and behavior: social control theory, general strain theory, general crime theory, social learning theory, attachment theories, and of distorted attribution, situational action theory, rational choice theory and finally the social development model. Although these theories have proposed significant evidence to support the idea that childhood trauma leads to criminal behavior, there are problems that arise from the proposed approaches. First, it can be difficult to determine which of the approaches individually helps to better understand responses to maltreatment (Baron and Forde 1). Second, the work may fail to recognize theoretical links between mediators, meaning the work may fail to represent understanding in a more complex way of thinking. According to Baron and Forde, the solution to these key questions lies in the Social Schematic Theory of Crime (SSTC). The social schematic theory of crime is the best internalized representation of the model's inherent past social interaction. Baron and Forde explain that offenders (someone who commits an illegal act) often emerge in settings that provide ongoing negative contexts and events involving poor parenting, poverty, crime-ridden environments, and exposure to peers involved in deviant behavior. The article states that these provide “a set of mutual lessons” that promote the idea of ​​“social patterns that justify crime” (Baron and Forde 1). Take Kathleen Maddox for example, she exposed Charles Manson in several locations that were considered "unreliable steamy venues". Charles Manson was based on the idea that social crime schemes often.