Should religion be taught in public schools? How will the parents take it? In my opinion it is better that religion does not enter public schools due to the controversy and media indignation it can arouse. Starting from one point of view, there are many reasons why it is necessary to talk about religion in the school building. One of the main reasons is that with knowledge comes understanding. In a FaithStreet article, readers are told that, according to polls, Americans are ignorant when it comes to religion and barely know anything about other practices. This leads to stereotypes and misunderstandings about what people believe, which is a big problem that can be avoided by learning. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay. Additionally, studies show that teasing and bullying people about their religion starts at a young age, around kindergarten, which is not acceptable at all. For these reasons, it is considered essential that students learn about as many religions as possible. Plus, Education Week experts remind us that it's 2016 and our student body is more diverse than ever. Because people fail to grasp the beauty of this reality, religion is at the root of hate crimes. As a result, classes have the opportunity to talk about and understand different cultures and beliefs. With basic knowledge they will have a better idea of ​​the impact of religion on “history, politics, society and culture”. On the other hand, there are many dangers in putting a sensitive topic like religion in the hands of schools. In a Washington Post article, a Jewish woman named Linda K. Wertheimer recounts her negative experience, which occurred when she was in the fourth grade. He makes it public that one day the school hired a woman to explain to the class how Jesus could solve their problems and that Jesus loves them. On the other hand, there are many dangers in placing a delicate topic such as religion in the hands of schools. This was an unacceptable experience because it promoted something that only Christian parents want their children to be exposed to. To elaborate, many people of all religions agree that it should be up to the parents of students what their children are taught in school and what not. An anonymous opinion was published stating: “It should not be a requirement to have religion in school. It should be a choice that religion is a requirement. Students should make a choice. Their parents should also have a choice” (Debate). Many others say no to these lessons because they don't want their children to spend their limited math, reading, and study time discussing a topic that is irrelevant to the school environment. In my opinion I strongly disagree, I think religion should not be allowed in a public school, but a private school would be acceptable because that would be the parents' choice of religion the student learns. As for public schools, I think learning about religion would stir up a lot of conflict. Some parents would feel offended because of their ethnicity, others would not want their children to learn religion at all. To further my point, I can speak for some students who imagine a student failing in a year because he or she failed the religious education course. Some students would think that learning about religion would be a waste of time. Parents would not approve of their children failing because of the subject (irrelevant). Even the debate about whether religion is real would make it anywaydifficult to include in school curricula. Some people would like proof that religion is real instead of this fake story of one man saving us all by sacrificing himself. Some parents assume that this is some kind of manipulation of their children into believing imaginary figures, such as the Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus, etc. I think religion should not be taught in schools because of the would cause controversy all over the world, even though I believe in religion, I just think the world is not ready for it to be taught in schools. This is important from the sociologists' point of view for a couple of reasons. This calls into question everything this country was founded and built on. When we take the Pledge of Allegiance we say “one nation under God.” “There are schools that don't allow students to say that because of the separation of church and state. Families are raised by religion and morals based on religion, if we started telling children that there is no such thing as God, they will believe that they have no morals and society itself would change. We would have a huge social change and children would grow up thinking that God does not exist. It is necessary for there to be religion in public schools to be able to maintain a social order for years. It may be difficult for some to distinguish these two terms: “teaching religion” and “teaching religion.” So what's the difference? “Teaching religion” means promoting certain religious doctrines and this action is strictly prohibited in public schools. “Teaching religion,” however, means introducing students to the role and value of various religions in the history, culture, and development of society in the United States and other countries. Tone is what really matters: when teaching religion, you should remain neutral and objective, regardless of what belief you are speaking. If religion were to be taught in schools, the teacher should discuss both majority and minority religions, so that no one feels offended. Discourses about religious beliefs should be constructed very carefully: children and adolescents are very sensitive when it comes to the influence of peers and the public. If someone hears negative (or too positive) comments about a certain religion, they may take these comments too much to heart – and this turns the process of “teaching religion” into that of “teaching religion.” If the teacher insists on letting each student talk about his or her religion, he or she should, first, give everyone enough time to prepare and, second, make sure that students' speeches do not contain promotion or insults towards certain religions. The teacher should not forget that there are also students, raised in families without particular religious beliefs. This is why topics such as the prevalence of religious beliefs over non-religious ones or vice versa are absolutely unacceptable during lessons on religion. It is known that many religious values ​​coincide with secular ones. It is right to teach students values ​​such as compassion, kindness, respect for self and others, honesty and friendliness, and this is exactly what teachers have done since the very first schools appeared in the world. At the same time, there should be no religious bias in teaching these values. The United States is the country where every person has the right to choose their religion and live according to its norms, and public school teachers cannot afford to impose a single religion on students, each of whom has a particular religion (or non-religion) - religious beliefs). I think the public school classroom does notis the place to try to impose my world formula of prayer on children who do not share it, and for this very reason I do not want my children in a public school classroom exposed to anyone else's religion or formula. Hart says he believes everyone should have the freedom to have their own beliefs. Other people's religious views should not be imposed on others, especially children. People like this disagree with those who believe that religion should be allowed in schools for various reasons. For example, many people who believe that religion should be taught in public schools argue that they have “free speech” guaranteed to them by the First Amendment. But does this mean that someone can go out in a public place and say whatever they want? This is where the fine line is drawn between religious and state issues. Religion should not overflow into government-funded education. It should not be allowed to teach religion in public schools because if religion were allowed there would be more controversy, many public school officials do not know enough about other religions besides their own, and finally, teaching children every religion is simply impossible. All these points lead to the conclusion that allowing the teaching of religion in public schools will only create even more problems and issues than there were before. There are already topics present in public schools without religion being discussed. In the article “ Getting Religion Right in Public Schools And, in the United States, the rapid expansion of religious diversity presents daunting new challenges to building a nation of many faiths and cultures in the 21st century, and we have enough problems with Trump already. way to get around it. The more you teach about religion, the more people will argue about what is true and what is not. Teachers cannot force a student to think a certain way or believe in a certain religion, but the student must think for himself and decide what to believe and what not to believe. The First Amendment to the Constitution states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or restrict freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. “There are many interpretations of the First Amendment. Because of the varying interpretations of this amendment, it would be difficult for all public school systems to answer the questions: To what extent should religion be taught if it is allowed to be taught? Does giving people freedom of religion and speech mean that religion should not be allowed to be taught? Or does this mean that religion should be allowed to be taught up to a certain point? It all depends on each situation. But there is no need to expose children to the risk of having to defend their faith in front of others who don't think like them. Children should not be forced to deal with topics that they themselves cannot control. All this is to say that allowing the teaching of religion in public schools would only lead to further controversy over religion and the start of many discussions that could have been avoided. Another reason why religious teaching should not be allowed in public schools is because many school officials and teachers do not know enough about other religions besides their own. The article “Getting Religion Right in Public School,” written by Charles C. Haynes, states: “Despite the recent increase in religious studies in schools, many Americans still have.