Fifth Generation Warfare is not new, revolutionary, or a new invention. It's part of the human experience. In the xGW framework, it is defined as “the covert deliberative manipulation of actors, networks, institutions, states, or any previous generational warfare force to achieve a goal or set of goals across a combination of socioeconomic and political domains while attempting to avoid or minimize retaliatory offensive or defensive actions/reactions that include enhanced actors, networks, institutions and/or states. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay According to this definition, 5th GW could include a form of war that manipulates: This war is a perception-based war focused on the context of the conflict. It is fought by manipulating perceptions and altering the context in which the world is perceived. Since the 5th GW is the manipulation of the observation context in order to force the enemy to do our will, an act of force is not required to manipulate the observation context, and therefore force is not necessary to wage the 5th war generation. The 5th GW can succeed by manipulating the perception of the identity of the enemy and its indigenous population in relation to each other and to friendly forces. It involves presenting potential adversaries with new observations that falsify hostile orientations and socializes those actors to develop more cooperative orientations. The strategic objective of the 5th GW is to fight the war with the adversary “without knowing who you are fighting”. BLA, BLF, such actors were funded by India to create anarchy in Baluchistan, Kulbhushan Jadav's involvement in an Indian espionage network and the claim that he was planning subversive activities against the recently launched multi-billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. He allegedly lived in Chabahar, an Iranian port on the Gulf of Oman, west of Pakistan, before illegally entering Baluchistan to create fifth-generation war insurgencies, he also explains that adversary states exploit economic vulnerabilities as the Indian spy is a good example to mobilize indigenous populations. This is how the 5th GW attacks the intellectual strength of rebellious opponents, literally denying them an enemy to fight against. The strategies of the 5th GW seek to problematize the enemy's knowledge of who is fighting and why it is necessary to resist the opponent. In other words, “the enemy must not feel that he is not on our side.” According to (Clausewitz 1989), war is an act of force to force our enemy to do our will. While it is quite comprehensive, it does not take into account other, more subtle forms of warfare. It has two main components, namely "act of force" and "forcing our enemy to do our will". A broader definition of war might be one that emphasizes the second part of Clausewitz's formulation, "to compel the enemy to do our will" (the purpose of war) more than the first part, "the act of force" (the means of war). In essence, the objective of war is essential in defining the nature of war. The means of war are not. In the same context, forcing the enemy to do our will is essential to warfare. It is not an act of force. In the 5th GW, new attacks are conducted by an individual or, at most, a very small group. Individuals or small groups with superpowers would be in line with several emerging global trends: the rise of biotechnology, the increased power of knowledge workers, and the shifting nature of loyalties, for example the anthrax and ricin attacks on Capitol Hill they could be the first examples of war offifth generation. Characteristics of the 5th GWSome of the salient characteristics are as follows: In the 5th GW, violence is so dispersed that the losing side may never realize that it has been conquered. The very secrecy of the 5th GW makes it the most difficult war generation to study. The most successful 5th GW attacks are those that are never identified. 5th GW attacks occur below the observation threshold. The 5th GW focuses on open source warfare, the disruption of virtual summer systems as a new form of political organization. In the 5th GW, actors are individuals who play their roles in a grand strategy without realizing their roles. So the fourth and fifth generation wars are “pre-Westphalian, in the sense that they mark the end of the nation-state.” Armed groups or networks do not fight in the name of the state nor are they under its control. This argument cuts both ways. He challenges those who argue that jihadist groups still function as a “real arm” of Pakistani state agencies (which nurtured and created them in the first place). And it undermines the logic of conspiracy patriots who claim that these groups are free agents. funded and used by foreign forces to sow evil in Pakistan. Understanding fifth generation warfare still does not take away the fact that state policies will remain the most crucial factor in defeating these new combatants. We now know that these terrorist groups are structurally horizontal and non-hierarchical, which increases their resilience. The nation-state is not their unit of analysis and territorial boundaries do not impede their goals and objectives. They are willing to co-opt other networks or be co-opted whenever there is synergy: TTP and LeJ share the anti-Shia agenda; and LeT share anti-India agenda; and Al-Qaeda, the Afghan Taliban and share the anti-American agenda. Since these networks are not structured organizations but loose constellations, they are free agents and are likely co-opted by foreign agencies against Pakistan and its security forces for selected operations. State networks of violence – and probably at the top of their list – is their anti-Pakistan agenda. They do not accept the Constitution of Pakistan and the rights and responsibilities it imposes on citizens; they do not accept the mandate of the state and the government and the legitimacy of the policies prepared by the state; and do not accept the rights and responsibilities of Pakistan as a nation state under international law. These networks will accept being co-opted by the Pakistani state as long as the state agenda overlaps with theirs. So, if our formal policy is to send jihadists to Kashmir and Afghanistan, TTP, LeT and Daesh are willing partners. But if our foreign and national security policy changes and the export of jihadists is not seen as furthering Pakistan's national security interests, the same groups will turn against the state. The greatest failure of our national security system has been the dual illusion that (i) violent jihadist networks can be individually controlled and employed to advance state objectives, and (ii) the religion-based ideology of hatred that drives them can be transformed without will. What we have witnessed instead is reverse indoctrination. They are state agents who have been indoctrinated with the religiously inspired ideology of hatred which then leads them to sympathize with jihadist organizations, as evident from the reportedly insider-facilitated attacks on security institutions. . And this makes logical sense. Nationalism and the nation-state are artificial concepts. Religion is not (except for atheists, of course).Although our soldier is motivated in both the name of country and religion, it would be difficult to say that his state identity trumps his religious identity in case there is a perceived conflict between the two. What the history of the conflicts in Vietnam and Afghanistan has taught us is that even when powerful states fought a fourth-generation war with a third-generation strategy and lost, fifth-generation warfare further blurred many lines: what is a battlefield and what is not? What is a fighter and what is not? What is a weapon and what is not? If you bring war to North Waziristan, they will also bring it to urban centres. If you attack the cutthroat brutes, they will attack 14-year-old schoolgirls. As you ponder the legality and sanity of using air power and heavy artillery, they will brainwash 14-year-olds to blow themselves up among unsuspecting civilians. This is a new form of warfare. Fighters or terrorists are not misguided fools. These are cunning and ruthless tacticians who fight a no-holds-barred conflict. They include the moral, psychological, social, economic and political dimensions of this war. They see a growing national consensus against their media-driven agenda and tactics after the attack on Malala, and they threaten to attack the media. But deterrence is not enough. They then justify the attack in religious terms, based on examples from the lives of our prophets. And that helps sow enough confusion to stem the rising tide against them. An era of asymmetric warfare. Cyber ​​warfare attacks are also part of 5th GW warfare which can disable official websites and networks, disrupt or disable essential services, steal or alter confidential data, and cripple financial systems – among many other possibilities that states use to go to war through rebels and technological bases that their image would not be shown to other states, we have good examples of Indian naval officers. In this regard, the United States surpasses other countries in the world. According to Snowden, the United States has access to all major markets in the world. The United States also traced the calls of German Vice Chancellor Angela Markel. The United States spends $360 billion on research and development each year. They have orchestrated a couple of innovative technologies that can bring a great deal of destruction to other countries in the world. China will have to deal with US cyber warfare. 500 million Chinese use the Internet every day. China is quite worried about US cyber warfare. In 2014, the Internet contributed approximately 14% of China's GDP. If China does not take drastic measures in the future, monolithic destruction would occur for China regarding its economy. It is very fascinating on the international scene that the war is changing with each passing year. Thus, the coming era would be an era of proxy warfare and subconventional warfare. During the Cold War both superpowers, the USA and the USSR, had conventional weapons, but did not use them. If they had used conventional warfare, the entire world would have been destroyed. Therefore they have used proxy warfare in different parts of the world. In the current circumstances, many states of the world follow the trajectory of the USA and the USSR. The United States also uses fifth-generation warfare to counter China's hegemony. There is a strong perception of the United States that it created ISIS to counter the hegemony of China and Russia. In 2004 the Bush administration's National Security Council predicted that there would be a group that would implement the tenets of Islam. A group, 70(1), 171-183.