With the advancement of technology, some may use the information as a way to penetrate security to violate privacy and personal information and harm others. You can find information to spot criminal activity and save lives. However, this may violate our right to privacy and censorship for innocent civilians. The First Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits any law that affects freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, interferes with the right of peaceful assembly, and prohibits petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. . Including the Fourth Amendment, which alludes to the right to privacy. There have been some situations where Apple has protected the privacy and safety of civilians, including criminals. This exception, if granted by ISP, would completely undermine our Fourth Amendment. ECPA reform may be necessary because in 1986, most people lacked computers, email, smartphones, GPS, tablets, cloud storage, and social media. This being the case, many reforms are needed to ensure the privacy of citizens, as most are unaware that their information is so easily accessible by others. People have become easy to track, easy to persecute, easy to read with this limitation on possible violations of our Fourth Amendment. Criticism of the Patriot Act has been evident in which federal law enforcement agencies are able to collect private information for the sake of national security. However, there are also debates about whether or not private companies should collect and share data collected through financial, medical, or consumer data. Problems with tracking individual logins to websites and browser history are a big concern. The issue is not the right to privacy or the need for publicity, but rather a good way to balance privacy and public