Every state has its own distinct electoral system in choosing its government, Great Britain is no exception. It is a well-established country, which also seeks an adequate and effective legislature. This in turn implies a fair and rational voting policy and distribution of seats. During the periods it has had different election systems and the current one is First-Past-The-Post (FPTP here and after). However, recently the British government has started to investigate its disadvantages and advantages, the rationality and fairness of elections and is now considering replacing it with proportional representation (PR here and next). The PR is the electoral system in which the seats in parliament are almost in the same proportion as the votes cast, while the FPTP is a plurality/majority system, in which the parties with the most votes take all and represent the entire Parliament . (accessible at http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/) The following essay will analyze the advantages and disadvantages of PR and in conclusion argue that this system can successfully replace FPTP in British government election. with benefits, PR would lead to better representation of racial and ethnic minorities (Amy 1997). These parties are given constituent power at the public and regional level in the countries that exploit this system. Western Europe and Latin America are the demonstrative examples where PR is dominant according to Andrew Reynolds and Ben Reilly (2002). Furthermore, imposing this system would provide voters with a greater quantity of views, so that minor party candidates would have a better chance of winning a Westminster seat (Amy 1997). Participation in the resolution of government issues would help to develop some new concepts, which are not... half of paper... proportional representation can adequately replace First Past The Post in British government elections and I believe that the imposition of public relations will affect the further prosperity of the government and the country as a whole. Works Cited1. Amy, J. 1997. Full Representation: The Case for a Better Electoral System. United States: Crescent Street Press.2. Farrell, M. 2001. Electoral systems: a comparative introduction. Basingstoke: Macmillan.3. Gallagher, M. and P. Mitchell. and. 2008. The politics of electoral systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press4. Hix, S., R.Johnston and I.Mclean 2010. A research report prepared for the British Academy. London.5. Reynolds, A., B. Reilly, and A. Ellis. 2008. Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook. Sweden: Trydells Tryckeri AB.6. http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/proportional_representation.htm