Connecticut. It shows their views on the right to privacy and will influence how they perceive citizens' rights when they take office. Furthermore, they should be asked about their opinions on the landmark case, Griswold v. Connecticut, because the case concerns certain rights that people deem essential and necessary. to them that it must be kept or lost and would force potential candidates to openly explain what the case means to them and whether they are for it or whether they are against it and how they would apply what happened in the case to real life. In the case Griswold v. Connecticut, the Supreme Court held that the use of contraceptives violated the right to marital privacy. It concerns a Connecticut law that criminalizes the encouragement or use of birth control. Estelle Griswold and Dr. C. Lee Buxton, were arrested after being found accomplices and guilty of illegal contraception. Both were fined $100. They also appealed to the Supreme Court arguing that the law was unconstitutional. The right to privacy is paramount when dealing with married citizens. The right to privacy cannot be denied