Topic > Negative Essay: The Devil's Advocate on GMOs - 1015

Miller first mentions how in every study many scientists use animals as a way to test theories. In this case the animals were given modified food and what they found was that the food was harmful to the animals; they suffered. Considering what has happened to animals, why would we consider trusting a modified plant? “Genetically modified foods – also called genetically modified foods – contain DNA that scientists have modified in an unnatural way, for example by adding a gene from a different organism, according to the World Health Organization” (Miller). In this respect no one would be willing to buy a product like this, there should be a reason to be afraid of the word GMO. Some cosmetics are good for our economy and plants, but cannot or should not be classified as GMO. Miller even points out: "During the event, Druker, a public interest attorney, argued that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration misrepresented the safety of genetically modified foods and violated federal food safety law by allowing them to be released on the market. market". This should answer anyone's question that GMOs have not been proven to be safe, because not all cosmetics are suitable for our