Pro-Choice Philosophy and Abstinence We recognize no single, universal, objective moral truth that determines our moral decisions. Instead, we must consider a broad range of values ​​whenever we seek to make wise, ethical, and compassionate choices. We respect a woman's moral capacity to make decisions regarding her health and well-being, including reproductive decisions. A woman's choices reflect how she evaluates various circumstances in her life: her important relationships, her economic, social, and emotional resources and obligations, her health, her religious or philosophical beliefs, and the well-being of others for who has responsibility. We live our destinies in a world of vast and profound complexity, where claims on our compassion and judgment compete and often conflict. A woman respects the preciousness of human life by recognizing and honoring the intricate fabric of her relationships and commitments; in fact, we believe that the complexity of human life can be a source of moral wisdom and courage. A woman's ability to choose is rooted in her individual conscience, not in her adherence to ancient superstitious religious beliefs. In preparation for hearings on revamping the federal abstinence-only education system, the National Coalition Against Censorship and 35 supporting organizations, including The National Education Association, the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States, and the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, they launched the “Campaign Against Abstinence-Only Education.” funded sex education programs that limit students' access to information and limit learning to an approved message about human sexuality. Students should be allowed to decide whether to remain virgins, whether to engage in sexual promiscuity, whether or not to follow parental advice, and countless other issues related to human sexuality. The statement also claims that a provision of federal law mandating abstinence-only education in schools amounts to censoring sexual information because it does not give students access to condoms, pills and contraceptive devices, and “puts silence conversations about sexual orientation”, as well as limiting students' free expression of their sexuality. rights in other ways.